Independent owner-maintained website. The Cantrice Court name is used solely to identify the Cantrice Court community in Simi Valley, California, and the subject of this site. This website is not affiliated with, sponsored by, authorized by, or operated by the Cantrice Court Condominium Owners' Association, its Board of Directors, or its management company.
SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 BOARD MEETING · ROOFING

WHERE’S THE BEEF?

Show us the roofing numbers.

Another roofer was presented. Owners still did not get the project price, detailed scope, or a building-by-building answer showing which roofs need replacement now and which can wait. Yet the Board still wants nearly $2 million — including roughly $400,000 in added contingency.

Satirical cartoon about a nearly two million dollar roof assessment presented without detailed pricing or scope
Editorial cartoon. Satire, not verbatim dialogue.

Editorial cartoon / satire: visual dialogue is satirical and is not presented as a verbatim quotation from any director, manager, owner, or contractor.

What the record shows

The Association’s written September assessment communication says it has a roofing-company quote for the remaining roof replacements totaling close to $1.6 million. The same communication explains that the Board selected a fixed $2 million assessment to allow room for cost growth and unexpected contingency costs, and specifically discusses the roughly $400,000 difference.

At the September 29 meeting, the roofing contractor presentation described roofing conditions, process and protocols. No project price or complete building-by-building scope was presented to owners. The contractor also explained that the amount of damaged plywood cannot be known until roof areas are opened.

The question: If uncertainty is being used to justify hundreds of thousands of dollars in contingency, what assumptions, roof-by-roof prioritization, historical plywood experience, and pricing support that amount?

Meeting descriptions on this page are based on the owner’s contemporaneous account of the September 29 meeting unless a published Association record linked above independently confirms the point.